Faculty of Human and Social Sciences Council Discusses Strategic Report

In the morning of Saturday, April 27, 2024, the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Council held a meeting to discuss various agenda items, including the strategic report. The meeting was attended by the dean, deputy dean, program directors, and coordinators of the faculty and programs.

The council members engaged in an in-depth discussion following the presentation of the dean’s statement. Several key topics were addressed, including the following:

1. Strategic Committee Report: The council reviewed a comprehensive report on the activities and progress of the Strategic Committee. The report highlighted the committee’s efforts in developing long-term goals and objectives for the faculty, as well as strategies to enhance the quality of education and research.
2. Evidence Development Committee Report: The council also examined a report on the work carried out by the Evidence Development Committee. This report sheds light on the committee’s initiatives to gather and analyze data, assess teaching methodologies, and implement evidence-based practices to improve the overall effectiveness of the faculty’s programs.
3. Postgraduate Studies Report: A report was presented to update the council on the current state of postgraduate studies within the faculty. This included an overview of the existing programs, enrollment statistics, research activities, and plans for further development in postgraduate education.
4. Preparation Committee for the Scientific Day Report: The council received a report from the committee responsible for organizing the upcoming Scientific Day. This report detailed the preparations underway, including the selection of topics, invited speakers, and logistical arrangements. The council expressed its support for the committee’s efforts and encouraged active participation from faculty members and students.
5. Quality Report: The council reviewed a comprehensive quality report, which assessed the overall performance and adherence to quality standards within the faculty. The report highlighted areas of strength and areas that require improvement, providing valuable insights for ongoing quality enhancement initiatives.